The #1 Employee Engagement Survey Backed by Science: A Deep Dive Into PI Diagnose

Employee engagement surveys are everywhere. Lattice, Glint, CultureAmp, Gallup, Qualtrics — the list just keeps growing. But here’s the real question leaders should be asking:

Are these tools actually helping you improve engagement… or are they just collecting data?

In this blog, we break down how The Predictive Index (PI) Diagnose Engagement Survey stacks up against the competition — and why it may be one of the most overlooked, high-impact tools in the HR tech market.

If you prefer a more detailed analysis, I’ve also recorded a deeper breakdown. You’ll find the link in the comments.

 
 

Why PI Diagnose Isn’t “Just Another Survey Tool”


Most engagement surveys provide useful data — scores, benchmarks, trends — but stop short of telling leaders what to actually do with that information.

PI Diagnose is different.
It’s rooted in behavioral science and designed to translate engagement data into clear, actionable leadership recommendations. Instead of just reporting what your people are feeling, it helps you understand why they're feeling that way and what to do next.

 



The Employee Engagement Landscape: Who’s Competing?

 

Before we highlight what makes PI Diagnose unique, let’s look at the major players many organizations consider.

Lattice & CultureAmp

These platforms offer strong survey capabilities and intuitive dashboards. But their engagement features are largely data-first — meaning they provide numbers and summaries, not tailored guidance for leaders.

Great tools, but often missing the “now what?”

Glint (Microsoft Viva)

Glint recently scored high praise in Forrester’s Employee Experience report. It’s a powerhouse platform for enterprise organizations.

However, its primary focus remains surveying and measurement, not behavior-driven solutions or step-by-step improvement plans.

Gallup

Gallup is renowned for deep research and insight-driven analytics. But it comes with enterprise-level pricing and less flexibility for organizations that want custom, agile engagement approaches.

Qualtrics

A brilliant analytics engine, ideal for large-scale enterprises that need complex data modeling.

But for many HR teams, Qualtrics is more horsepower than they need — and often requires additional tools or consulting to translate insights into action.

Leapsome, Quantum Workplace, Energage & Others

These platforms offer strong flexibility and good benchmarking.

But like many engagement tools, they still fall short on helping leaders turn insight into cultural change.


  

 

Why Predictive Index Diagnose Stands Out

 

Among a crowded field, PI Diagnose offers a distinct advantage — it’s built from the ground up to be action-oriented and rooted in behavioral science.

Here’s what makes it different:

1. Backed by Behavioral Science

PI Diagnose doesn’t just tell you what people said.
It helps you understand why they feel the way they do.

This connection between behavioral data and engagement results is unmatched in the market.

2. Clear, Actionable Recommendations

This is PI’s superpower.

Leaders don’t have to decode analytics or run workshops to interpret data. PI Diagnose gives specific, practical steps leaders can take to improve engagement, team dynamics, and culture.

3. Surprisingly Cost-Effective

With packages starting around $7,500/year, organizations get enterprise-level insights without enterprise-level costs.

For many, it becomes a replacement for multiple tools, reducing tech stack complexity.

4. Consolidated Platform

Instead of juggling multiple engagement, culture, and performance tools, PI offers:

  • Strategy alignment

  • Behavioral insights

  • Team analytics

  • Engagement measurement

  • Leadership coaching guidance

One ecosystem. One language. One workflow.

5. Aligns Engagement to Business Strategy

This is perhaps the most overlooked differentiator.

PI Diagnose helps leaders connect engagement drivers to strategic priorities — meaning the outcome isn’t just better survey scores… it’s better business performance.

 

Bottom Line: If You Want Action, Not Just Data, PI Diagnose Wins

 

There are dozens of excellent survey platforms. Many provide clean UIs, robust dashboards, and helpful analytics.

But if you want a tool that:

  • Explains why engagement looks the way it does

  • Tells leaders exactly what to do next

  • Connects engagement to strategy

  • Is backed by behavioral science

  • Helps you actually improve culture and performance

Predictive Index Diagnose is the one to beat.

 

Join the Conversation

Have you used an engagement platform before?
What’s been your biggest challenge turning data into action?

Drop your experience in the comments — I’d love to hear which tools you’ve tried and what you’ve learned.

And if you found this comparison helpful, follow along for more Predictive Index insights, practical leadership guidance, and deep dives into the tools that actually move the needle.

 

 
 

 

The Impact of Integrations Between Applicant Tracking Systems & PI

The Impact of Integrations Between Applicant Tracking Systems & PI

Maximizing Efficiency: The Strategic Impact of API Integrations Between Applicant Tracking Systems and the Predictive Index

Read More
Predictive Index News, Tips and Tricks - The Promoter Reference Profile

Predictive Index News, Tips and Tricks - The Promoter Reference Profile

Welcome to the April 2024 Predictive Index Newsletter, where we will share some simple tips and tricks to help you utilize your Predictive Index...

Read More