2 min read
The Most Important Predictive Index Factor Combinations (And When Each One Matters Most)
So… Which Factor Combinations Matter Most? Let's start with what a Factor Combination is. In Predictive Index (PI), a factor combination...
3 min read
Meetings are expensive. Utilize Predictive Index to maximize their impact.
Harvard Business Review research highlights just how painful ineffective meetings can be:
-
71% of senior managers said meetings are unproductive and inefficient
-
Nearly one-third felt that meetings prevent them from completing their own work
-
Executives spend an average of 23 hours per week in meetings, yet many leave without clear next steps or actionable outcomes
These statistics underscore one simple truth: who leads a meeting matters as much as the meeting itself. Choosing the right chair — someone who can balance collaboration, structure, and engagement — can dramatically improve meeting outcomes, team alignment, and follow-through.
Predictive Index Factors to Consider When Choosing a Chair
Factor A – Dominance
-
Low A (Collaborative, inclusive) is generally preferable for meeting chairs.
-
Why: Low A leaders encourage participation, create space for multiple voices, and prevent one person from dominating the agenda.
-
Consideration: They may need support to keep discussions moving and avoid excessive tangents.
-
Meeting impact: Greater engagement, better buy-in, and more creative solutions from the team.
-
Factor B – Extraversion
-
High B can be situationally advantageous.
-
Why: A chair who is energetic and engaging can stimulate discussion and encourage quieter participants to speak up.
-
Consideration: High B should be calibrated so discussion doesn’t become chaotic or monopolized.
-
Meeting impact: Improved ideation, participation, and team energy, especially in strategic or brainstorming meetings.
-
Factor C – Patience
-
Both high and low C have advantages depending on the meeting type:
-
High C (steady, process-oriented) chairs help keep longer meetings focused and maintain consistency.
-
Low C (fast-paced, flexible) chairs can drive quick decision-making and tolerate ambiguity in strategic discussions.
-
-
Meeting impact: Choosing the right C level helps ensure the pace matches the meeting’s purpose.
Factor D – Formality
-
High D is arguably the most important factor for a chair.
-
Why: High D ensures meetings follow a clear process, agendas are respected, and discussions produce outcomes.
-
Consideration: High D chairs prevent meetings from being canceled, lost in tangents, or lacking closure.
-
Meeting impact: Consistent delivery, actionable outcomes, and reliability in follow-up — all critical for organizational productivity.
-
Factor Combinations That Support Effective Meetings
-
Low A + High D → Encourages collaboration while ensuring the meeting stays structured, on track, and accountable.
-
Low A + Situational High B → Facilitates engagement and ideation while preserving collaboration and participation.
-
High D + High/Moderate C → Balances structured processes with an appropriate pace, ensuring that meetings are productive and decisions are executed.
Best Practices for Meeting Chairs
Effective meetings go beyond the chair — they require operating norms and process discipline. Chairs should embed these practices to maximize impact:
-
Set Clear Meeting Goals
-
Every meeting should have a defined purpose: decision-making, problem-solving, alignment, or brainstorming.
-
Chairs should articulate the objective at the start.
-
-
Develop Ground Rules
-
Norms for participation, timing, decision-making, and respectful debate help ensure meetings are productive.
-
-
Scorecard & Metrics Reviews
-
Use quick data or KPI reviews to focus discussions on results rather than anecdote.
-
-
Action Follow-Up
-
Every meeting should produce actionable next steps, assigned owners, and deadlines.
-
Chairs should ensure these are documented and tracked.
-
-
Structured Problem-Solving
-
Use frameworks or agendas to guide the team through complex decisions without losing momentum.
-
Encourage ideation before evaluation, balancing High B creativity with High D structure.
-
-
Regularly Reinforce Norms
-
At the start of each meeting, briefly remind participants of expectations for participation, decision-making, and process.
-
Key Takeaways
-
Low A chairs are often most effective — they foster participation, collaboration, and creative input.
-
High D ensures consistency — critical for keeping meetings structured, productive, and reliable.
-
High B can be situationally beneficial — energizes discussions and encourages engagement, particularly in brainstorming or strategic sessions.
-
C factor should align with the meeting’s pace — higher C for steady, longer discussions; lower C for quick, high-energy problem-solving.
-
Factor combinations matter — low A + high D is often ideal; situational High B can add energy without losing structure.
-
Meeting operating norms are essential — clear goals, ground rules, scorecards, action follow-up, and structured problem-solving practices improve both effectiveness and accountability.
Choosing the right chair is not about hierarchy or personality — it’s about behavioral fit for the meeting’s purpose. When done right, meetings become engines of alignment, decision-making, and organizational progress.
2 min read
Understanding the Four Forces of Disengagement — and How Predictive Index Helps Fix Them
The Four Forces of Disengagement Employee engagement isn’t a luxury — it’s a strategic necessity. Highly engaged teams deliver better customer...
.jpeg)
3 min read
The #1 Employee Engagement Survey Backed by Science (PI Diagnose Review)
The #1 Employee Engagement Survey Backed by Science: A Deep Dive Into PI Diagnose Employee engagement surveys are everywhere. Lattice, Glint,...